Decision no. 412/2008

Application

 

Applicant, Status

Mirjam G., Rejection

Public owner

Stadt Wien

Type of property

immovable

Real estate in

KG Dornbach (01401), Wien, Wien | show on map

Decision

 

Number

412/2008

Date

21 Jan 2008

Reason

In rem restitution already granted after 1945

Type

substantive

Decision in anonymous form

Press release

Press Release Decision No. 412/2008

Vienna, Dornbach
The Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution has rejected a claim for restitution of a property in Vienna-Dornbach, which was owned by the City of Vienna on the cut-off date of 17 January 2001.  The property had already been restituted to the former owner in 1951. For this reason, the Arbitration Panel was unable to pronounce a renewed restitution of this property.

The property, with an area of around 7,500m² - on which a former hunting lodge from the late 18th century that had been converted into an apartment building was located – belonged to Samuel L., proprietor of a banking and commission business in Vienna.  According to the Nuremberg Laws, Samuel L. was a Jew and in 1939, he fled to Palestine with his wife and seven children.

By the end of 1938, L. had concluded a verbal contract with Franz G., Ernst Sch. and Willibald W. concerning the sale of the property.  As the National Socialist Property Transaction Office was of the opinion that the price of just under 60,000 Reich marks was too low, the sale was initially not authorised.  However, after a lien creditor threatened a petition in bankruptcy against the banking house of L., which the National Socialist authorities intended to liquidate, and which was actually dissolved in 1942, the Property Transaction Office consented to the sale of the property for 60,000 Reich marks.

At the beginning of 1948, Samuel L., who had survived the Second World War in Palestine, applied to the Restitution Commission Vienna for the restitution of the property.   In 1951, Franz G., Ernst Sch. and Willibald W. were sentenced to return the property to L. in exchange for a repayment of around 58,000 Schillings.  In September 1951, Samuel L. sold the property for 370,000 Schillings to the City of Vienna, who consequently built a municipal apartment building on the plot of land.

The Arbitration Panel has already established in previous decisions that it cannot recommend the renewed return of a property that has already been restituted.  The purpose of the General Settlement Fund Law is to clarify all open questions regarding the compensation of the victims of National Socialism.  The claim for restitution asserted before the Arbitration Panel has however already been positively decided in earlier proceedings.  For these reasons, the application for restitution of the property was rejected.

For use by media; not legally binding upon the Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution.
For further inquiries contact: