Decision no. 1105/2014

Application

 

Applicant, Status

Erna B., Rejection
Margalit H., Rejection

Public owner

Stadtgemeinde Stockerau

Type of property

immovable

Real estate in

KG Stockerau (11142), Stockerau, Niederösterreich | show on map

Decision

 

Number

1105/2014

Date

03 Dec 2014

Reason

No "extreme injustice" pursuant to Sec. 32 (2) item 1 of the GSF Law

Type

substantive

Decision in anonymous form

Press release

Press Release Decision No. 1105/2014

Lower Austria, Stockerau
On 3 December 2014, the Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution rejected an application for in rem restitution of a property belonging to the Municipality of Stockerau in Stockerau. A settlement had been concluded regarding the property in 1948 in which the heirs of the original owner waived restitution in exchange for a payment of 55,000 Schilling. The Arbitration Panel did not assess this settlement to be extremely unjust in accordance with the Entschädigungsfondsgesetz (“General Settlement Fund Law” – GSF Law).

In 1938, the requested property was under the sole ownership of Hermann H., who was considered Jewish in accordance with the Nuremberg Laws of 1935. In 1938 a residential building was situated on the property in which the original owner ran a general store.

On 31 October 1938, Hermann H. concluded an authorization and trusteeship contract with the Ostmärkischen Revisions- und Treuhand-Gesellschaft m.b.H. for the administration and liquidation of his assets. On 20/28 November 1940 the mentioned company sold the property to the Municipality of Stockerau for 37,000 Reichsmark. The purchase price had to be transferred into a frozen account.

On 19 October 1941, Hermann H. and his wife Adelina H were deported to the Lodz Ghetto, where they perished. The spouses had two children: Erwin H. fled to Palestine in 1938; Erna B. to Great Britain in 1939.

On 9 December 1948, Erwin H. and Erna B. waived the restitution of the property in exchange for a payment of 55,000 Schilling. On 17 January 2001 the property continued to be owned by the Municipality of Stockerau.

The Arbitration Panel’s judicial appraisal mainly focused on the question whether the settlement of 1948 was to be assessed as “extremely unjust”. Despite determining a discrepancy in value between the settlement sum and the value of the property, no indications existed, however, that the freedom of contract of Erwin H. and Erna B. had been limited during the settlement negotiations. Therefore, the Arbitration Panel did not qualify the settlement as “extremely unjust” in accordance with the GSF Law and rejected the application.

For use by media; not legally binding upon the Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution.
For further inquiries contact: