Decision no. WA13/2015

Application

 

Applicant, Status

Simon B., Recommendation
Lydia M., Recommendation

Public owner

Republik Österreich
Land Oberösterreich

Type of property

immovable

Real estate in

KG Steinbach am Attersee (50320), Steinbach am Attersee, Oberösterreich | show on map

Decision

 

Number

WA13/2015

Date

29 Sep 2015

Reason

No prior measure pursuant to the GSF Law

Type

substantive

Decision in anonymous form

Related decisions

Press release

Press Release Decision No. WA13/2015 re 1135/2015

Upper Austria, Steinbach am Attersee
On 29 September 2015, the Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution reopened the proceedings that had led to decision no. 1135/2015 of 21 May 2015 and supplemented this decision by recommending the Province of Lower Austria to award a comparable asset for a 503 m² area of the Großalm Landstraße. The Arbitration Panel had already recommended the restitution of an area of Seeleiten Straße. As these areas today form parts of roads the Arbitration Panel will recommend that the applicant be awarded a comparable asset.

In 1938, the property in Steinbach am Attersee, on which a villa on land bordering the lake and a modest residential house were built, was owned by Sophie B., respectively the mother and the grandmother of the two applicants. Following the Anschluss in 1938, the properties were subjected to a forced sale at auction in 1941. For this sale, the property was split into two parts. The winning bid for the first part was placed by a group comprising the Municipal Council Vöcklabruck and several industrial enterprises from the region. The winning bid for the second part was placed by the spouses Rupert and Josepha W.

As Sophie B. had not filed an application for restitution after 1945, the Collection Agency A, established following the Staatsvertrag von Wien (“State Treaty of Vienna”) 1955, laid claim to the property and, in 1962, waived restitution in exchange for settlement payments from the Vöcklabruck District Commission and Rupert and Josefa W. However, several property parcels formerly belonging to Sophie B.’s property were not covered by these settlements.

The Arbitration Panel has already ruled in its decision no. 1135/2015 that a seizure had occurred as defined by the Entschädigungsfondsgesetz (“General Settlement Fund Law” – GSF Law) and recommended the restitution of an area of Sophie B.’s original property that had been owned by the Republic of Austria on the cut off day, 17 January 2001.

During the process of establishing the exact dimensions of the recommended area it emerged that a further partial area of Sophie B.’s properties that had not been covered by the settlement of 1962 had been partitioned off in 1979 to become part of the Großalm Landstraße and on 17 January 2001 it was owned by the Province of Upper Austria. As this area was, as such, also publicly-owned the Arbitration Panel reopened the proceedings and supplemented its previous decision. As this area also met all of the requirements for in rem restitution, the Arbitration Panel recommended in decision no. WA/RO 13/2015 re 1135/2015 that a comparable asset also be awarded for this area.

For use by media; not legally binding upon the Arbitration Panel for In Rem Restitution.
For further inquiries contact: